No Champagne, please... We're Africans
I’ve just been on safari in Africa,
that large cashew-nut shaped mass that sprawls from the Mediterranean down to
where the Atlantic and Indian Oceans meet.
I left the continent just before the 92nd birthday
celebrations for Mr Robert Mugabe were held in Harare and was, therefore, not
able to join the adoring throngs congratulating the obviously infirm
gentleman on attainment of such a great age. But, as this Black History Month ends,
I cannot help but recall Martin Luther King’s deprecation of pointless
longevity. Longevity is all well and good. However it most certainly
has limits when it comes to ruling a country. Sure, among a venerable's family
gathered around his feet receiving the pearls of wisdom acquired over a long
life, the pleasures may be manifold. But equally likely, there may be some maverick
skulking in the fringe who might beg to differ, remarking under his breath,
eyes rolling, that granddad always has something to say, relevant or not. But,
by and large, the respect and affection deriving from great age will be his.
While
thinking about Mugabe’s birthday bash (who knows how much that cost?). I
thought we should take a look at the league table of long-term African leaders
who have gone beyond their sell-by date. The list is a long one but for this
piece, let us restrict ourselves to the five with the longest period in office
who, together, have served for a total of 169 years. They are, in order of
length of service:
1.
José
Eduardo dos Santos – Angola (36 years)
2.
Robert
Mugabe – Zimbabwe (36 years)
3. Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo –
Equatorial Guinea (35 years)
4.
Paul
Biya – Cameroon (34 years)
5.
Yoweri
Museveni – Uganda (28 years)
And when we add the years imposed
by the next five long-termers, we reach a staggering two and three-quarter
centuries, a duration that rivals that of the Atlantic Slave Trade.
How
do they do it? Some of these superannuated gentlemen (note that they are all
men) get into this forever-mode by blatantly manipulating their country’s constitution.
Others use the blunter instrument of the military to grab and retain power
indefinitely.
There is no
doubt that being granddad is a lifelong gig, but being the ruler of a country
is not. Barring unexpected death while in office, governing a country must have
a time limit, beyond which a leader becomes burdensome. He may be excellent, but
too much of a good thing can be good for nothing. Fancy having nothing but
champagne and caviar every day for just one week. The mere thought induces
gaging. After a few days one begins to hanker for more ordinary fare like rice
and palaver sauce which, some among one's children and grandchildren’s
generation might be a great hand at cooking up. But, so what if they are not
such great cooks? One can always go elsewhere and defer indulgence in champers
and caviar for special occasions. Anyway, we all know that the African
champagne and caviar of the last 50 years has mostly been sour and rancid. By
all measures, Africa’s fifty-three countries remain firmly rooted in the bottom
of all indices of development that you care to invoke.
Something to
think about as we hold our breath and wait for Mr Mugabe’s one hundredth
birthday.
Tell Fren Tru
The mechanism by which power is achieved and maintained concerns me much more than the length of time a given leader stays in office. In Africa, this mechanism, which admittedly leaves much to be desired, is nonetheless commensurate with the people's mentality, in turn a function of their level of education and sub 50% literacy level. Surely, their political culture is, as they say, par for the course. Give all the people high school education and they will effect commensurate political leadership, including the length of time their leader stays in office.
ReplyDeleteWell, I hope you are right about the role of education in the ability to select leaders. In which case, we have nothing to be anxious about in a possible President Trump.
Delete