Putting a few words together is
never easy. Even at the best of times and in the best hands words come only
with difficulty. Stringing them together to express a thought coherently
sometimes feels like herding cats.
But we do not
live in the best times; and things are not even normal. Just by the mere act of
thinking an idea puts one on a collision course with the thought-control police.
And actually verbalizing a thought openly could well expose one to the charge
of purveying “Fake News”, a term beloved of the current leader of the Free
World.
Thus, anyone
playing with words or trying to use them, in these near-dystopian times also
plays with fire. This applies not just to the amateur but, as well, to the
professional who makes a living using words as an everyday commodity,
contributing to or putting together a newspaper or magazine, whether print or
digital. The living that such an individual makes depends on how much
credibility their organization has. People who buy or “consume” the product do
so with the confidence that they are getting a genuine article, the real deal.
If the product is wanting or faulty, it loses value and likely, market share as
well, just as any other commodity or service would in the marketplace. Definitely
“not good”, as Mr Trump would say. Consequently, our conscientious dealer in
words has to be sure that their source is impeccable and that any of their
ideas or opinions are well-founded. Even so, the accusation of “fake news” can
be quite destructive and difficult to shake, descending into a question of
“he said, she said”...
Fair enough, you
might be prepared to concede and then roll up your sleeves and join the rough
and tumble in the market place of ideas. But it seems the rules have changed
even more profoundly. In recent days and indeed, as we speak, we hear that the
Trump administration has signalled prohibition on the use of certain words. To
communicate with, not only his highness the President, but with his courtiers
too, certain words are to be avoided. We hear, for example, that, to speak to
authority, the CDC is having to mind its p’s and q’s and avoid certain words in
order to maintain ideological purity. Now, the CDC, the Centres for Disease
Control of America is one of that nation’s most venerable institutions. It is a
department of the US government that has, over many years sought to find ways
and means of controlling the spread of diseases in the country. And, as would
be obvious to anyone, controlling disease in one country also means that spread
to the rest of the world is curbed. This is critically important work that benefits
all. The CDC tackles other diseases and conditions as well: if it afflicts
humanity, they are there to reduce the potential impact. They collect the data;
they study the human condition, from fetus to the grave, and their findings
provide the evidence that is needed to make policy and guide decisions about
best practice in prevention and control.
To get their
message to us, the general public, and to those who provide the money for their
work, the CDC have to use plain language, the kind of language that we all can
understand; like “evidence”, “science-based”, “fetus”, “diversity”,
“entitlement”, etc. But now, we hear, they have to avoid using words such as
these for fear of annoying someone in authority. I should say though, that I
myself have not seen the original story of this new word-avoidance strategy, reportedly
published by the The
Washington Post, newspaper. Rather paradoxical. The Post’s
paywall bars me from reading their story, a move that introduces another layer
of irony into a landscape that is already riddled with ironies. True, there are
no free lunches and The Post is not obliged to hand me a freebie, even
though it’s almost Christmas and though they are making a point about
impediments to information flow, about which they and we are supposed to care.
But hey, this is
the season of goodwill to all men (and women too) and I, for one, will not
stint words in wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and a 2018 that is free of
pestilence and other distempers.
Tell
Fren Tru
Always a pleasure reading your blog. Sad but so very true. What a reversal of roles; from being the leader of the free world to being rejected by even your strong allies, as with the recent UN security council vote on Jerusalem. Merry Christmas and a Happy and blessed New Year to the entire family.
ReplyDeleteImpeccably presented sir. Leave the peccable for someone else. Fatuous displays of verbal poverty should not allow nocuous flights but in an innocuous manner gently put them back on a course of verbal rectitude.
ReplyDeleteMerry Christmas to you and yours! Let not careless words minish the reason for the season. He came for both the literate and the illiterate. We should not criminate or discriminate. There still maybe seats in the back of the bus.
Read with enjoyment.
ReplyDeleteHave a Happy Christmas and a Prosperous New Year.
Thanks Cuz. As we say in Krio, 'kapu sɛns nɔ kapu wɔd.' No gag order can stop us if and when we have something important to say. So keep on writing...I enjoy reading your post. I want to wish you and Tunus a 'Merry Christmas' and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year!
ReplyDelete