Tuesday, 7 January 2020

Surviving in the Era of Populism


Can’t fathom where the last decade went. True, some of its ravages have left their mark on this poor body of mine, but in other ways, things have been moving so fast and so far that the universe has become virtually unrecognizable from the one we knew at the beginning of the decade.
         Of course, the dominant motif has been the spread of this vast network of interconnectedness that links most of humanity together. I am talking here about the digital connections in which, we are told, 3.5 billion of us are engaged these days, treating each other and everyone who has access, to the tedium that defines our lives.
         But lest we forget, our digital inter-connectedness can never match the biological connectedness that links us, as humans, manifested in the indivisibility of the DNA sequences that weave us all together. To emphasize the point, although the number of genes coding for human characteristics and features has been downsized from the 100,000 that was calculated at the opening stages of the new genetics era to between 24,000 and 25,000 now, there is still a huge potential for variation that transcends family, group and region and exposes the emptiness of those who would divide us. And here we include non-essential attributes like skin colour, hair texture, body shape, physiognomy. It’s rather like being in a car lot where you’re looking at buying yourself a nice new motor. On that lot you see an array of vehicles, stretching from horizon to horizon: Different shapes, different sizes, colours, different marque, and indeed different models, some only slightly differing from the other. But all have four wheels (When did you last see a three-wheeler? Whenever one of these appears these days, it does so mainly for comic relief), a steering wheel, gear shift, accelerator and brake pedals, and the array of instruments on a dashboard. The motor under the hood, however, is the same: It could be internal combustion or, nowadays, electric. But they are still the engine that moves the whole thing along.
         The point I am making is that all those variations do not detract from the essence of ‘carness’, if I could coin a word. By the same token, human beings, on our car-lot of humanity, are essentially the same under the hood, despite or because of the 25000 genes that we each embody.  And, prick any of us, we bleed the same red blood. But it has become fashionable, in some quarters, to somehow, deny this reality by attempting to drive a wedge between communities and groups for only one sordid purpose, capturing power. From the streets of London to America’s heartland, and from the domes of the Kremlin to places along the languid waters of the Danube, and from the hovels of New Delhi to the dragons rising in China, and from the unfortunate Rohingyas on to Brazil’s burning Amazon,  “strong” men (and women, sadly) have wrested control from the hands of social democrats who, until recently, have been trying to make the world a better place. But by the end of the decade, things have taken a decidedly bad turn. True, the Robert Mugabes and Hosni Mubaraks, the Gadafis, the Tunisian Ben Alis, and The Gambian Yahyah Jammeh have been swept away. But the optimism that followed these ejections have not fulfilled their promise.
         Instead, there are important countries in which people are incited to hate each other to a level that has become totally toxic orchestrated by a President of the United States, for example, who, it seems, believes that wholesale disruption is the brilliant approach to refashioning world order. Even his domestic policies reverberate negatively around the world, and his so-called foreign policy directly threatens world peace. All we can do is hold our breath and hope that we can survive to exhale in the purer air of broad and sunlit uplands.

         So, despite the early signs, let us not despair but instead, wish ourselves survival in 2020.



Tell Fren Tru

Tuesday, 12 November 2019

Failing The Poppy Test


The world is a big place. There is so much we don’t know about it which, in general, behoves us to hold our tongue.
 I am thinking about the furore that has erupted in the lead-up to this year’s Remembrance Day, a day when the dead of world wars and other conflicts are remembered and commemorated. This time, the whole thing has been torpedoed by remarks made by a celebrity commentator, Don Cherry, whose normal business is to offer commentary on hockey games as they are played. On this occasion, Mr. Cherry felt impelled to comment on the apparent lack of a show of gratitude by new immigrants ('These people’, as he called them) to Canada for the sacrifice made by, presumably exclusively Canada-born veterans, who had sacrificed much, up to and including, in many cases, paying the ultimate price for the glory and survival of the British Empire, the amenities of which 'these people' dare to enjoy in Canada’s welcoming embrace. Their transgression? ‘These people’ did not show sufficient appreciation for the afore-mentioned sacrifices by wearing a poppy emblem on their lapel during the days leading to Remembrance Day.
        Whatever the merits or demerits of wearing or not wearing the emblem on one’s breast, there has to be something eerie in the vision of the 85-year old Cherry peering into the faces of individuals going about their normal business in his bid to administer the 'poppy test' as to who is or is not legit. It is a vision loaded with assumptions and not dissimilar to the Tebbit cricket test that, in Britain of the 1990s was supposed to be the measure of an individual’s patriotism, defined by whether they supported England or another Commonwealth country in a cricket match.
        In the case of Mr. Cherry’s, his mistake was not to have researched the role that immigrants to Canada and their forebears played in defending the Empire against the opposing forces, starting even before the two world wars. If Mr. Cherry had done his homework,  research would have prevented him from making a fool of himself. He would have discovered that the defence of the empire transcended races and regions.  He would have learnt also that the very first shot fired in anger by British forces in WWI was not by some anonymous person, but by one Alhaji Grunshi, a Gold Coast (present-day Ghana) Regimental Serjeant Major serving in Britain’s West African Frontier Force, when he returned fire against German forces in neighbouring ‘German’ Togoland. Grunshi was, and remains, one of the Forgotten Soldiers of Empire, whose descendants, more than a century on, are being disrespected by Don Cherry.
        But there are multiple other corners of the world, in the former British Empire, where what these men did, many dying in the process, is still celebrated and commemorated, including in Sierra Leone, for example, where Remembrance Day was celebrated this past Sunday and where this writer, in primary school, first learnt the opening lines of John McCrae’s “In
Flanders Fields, Where Poppies blow…” 


        Well, by the end of Remembrance Day, the unapologetic Mr. Cherry has been fired from his position and most people would say, “Not before time”. Lessons learnt? Maybe.
Tell Fren Tru