In Britain, they say that when the Labour Party is involved in scandal it
is usually because of money, whilst, in the case of the Tory party, sex is more
commonly the trigger. I certainly don’t know why these relationships should be
so. It may be that the Tories, in the main, have money at their disposal,
whilst access to licit sex may not be that readily available. In the Labour
Party, the reverse situations may apply. Who knows?
However, for the purpose of this blog, we will ignore
the Labour Party’s occasional fall from grace and focus, instead, on the Tories,
since they are the current party of government. My take however, is that it may
be unfair to see their party as a one-dimensional sex machine. On closer
inspection, privilege and the sense of entitlement that goes with it, is the
Tories’ greatest handicap. That sense of entitlement drives policy and locates Tories
at a place from which they can’t seem to understand or relate to the common
experience. Moreover, entitlement breeds that sense of exceptionalism, which sets
Tories further apart from the rest of humanity. From exceptionalism, it is an easy
segue to xenophobia. It is this xenophobia - fear of the other - that made the party notoriously resistant to the idea of a
European Union until, ultimately, the realities of a post-colonial decline
forced them to send in their application to what was then the Common Market. The
French, Britain’s nearest neighbour, know all about British (Tory)
exceptionalism and, at first, and then again and again, rejected their overtures.
I sense that the Tories have not
forgiven the French for this presumptuous act of hubris.
Four decades after entry, and still smarting from that
series of rejection, it has required just the jeers and taunts of a party on
the extreme right to frighten the Tories into calling a referendum to decide
whether to remain or leave the EU. Exiting would be a largely self-destructive
impulse, and most sensible opinion has said so, ranging from the UK’s own
central bank to international organizations and world leaders. It is uncomfortable
enough to see the right-wing Ukip tail wagging the Tory dog, but many
influential Tory party members are now out there, chanting the Ukip mantra and
ready to savage anyone daring to advocate remaining.
Into this toxic, already vituperative brew, steps
Barak Obama on his valedictory world tour including a stop to wish Queen Elizabeth
II a happy 90th and to get acquainted with the infant George VII. But,
flashing his usual broad smile, he also felt obliged to suggest, as many others
have done, that Brexit is a bad idea and that if that came to pass, Britain
would have to take its place at the back of the “queue” for negotiating a trade
deal with America... Ignoring the linguistic gulf between the two nations that
Obama’s use of a five-letter word instead of a four-letter one exposed, the
subsequent fracas would have been difficult to understand, if not for the fact
that the chief Tory Brexit spokesman, Boris Johnson, in a choice few phrases,
succeeded in not only demonstrating the most extreme version of Tory
xenophobia, but also the party’s lingering regret over the unravelling of their
erstwhile colonial enterprise.
Fair enough, you would say. But the reason I am
writing this blog is that I perceive Boris Johnson’s attempt to defame the President
of the United States, as just another facet in the Tory racist agenda, most
manifest when the Party faces problems at the ballot box, as is the case in the
Brexit referendum and in next month’s vote to choose a successor to Johnson as
Mayor of London.
Tell Fren Tru
